Superconductors, Magnetic Fields, and the Potential for Micro-Lagrange Points Considered
Are there indeed neutral points between superconductor magnetic fields which would mimic that of planetary Lagrange points? It is my contention that to superconductors side-by-side were perpendicular to each other would in fact create neutral zones overlook range points.
Let me explain this theory of mine.
You see, not long ago a talk to a mathematician expert from the University of California at Riverside, who specialized in Lagrange points.
And I ask this question; With regards to superconductor magnetic fields, is there a potential for Micro-Lagrange Points? Since scientists have found that two small pieces of Graphene in a lab can be spun at 60,000 RPM, in essence they are creating a magnetic field and the micro-superconductor.
Now then, if a set of spinning graphene micro-cut outs are moving around, as a superconductor wood, and since they conduct electricity extremely well, I asked; is there a neutral point in all that flow of energy? If so, it's a safe space for something, which leads to additional applications.
Consider if you will, if we are talking about superconductors on a very large scale, it could be a place for a "pod" for cargo, travelers, etc.
- there must be applications, and this should exist right? And at a micro scale, that is to say a couple of Graphene sheets perhaps a micron or so across, spinning and 60,000 RPM will create something that would simulate planetary Lagrange points.
Indeed there was a study and some research on this [1] - which suggests that such points could trap wave packets in a similar way to Jupiter's lagrange points trapping Trojan Asteroids at the planetary level.
And in this research it further suggests a tunneling factor, and a stable and slow decaying condition of these points in Rydberg atoms.
So, then, if this condition happens at the atomic level, and the planetary level, then it should happen anytime spinning parts revolve next to each other, as they do in Superconductors.
I'd hereby like to dare anyone to prove my theory wrong.
Because since Planetary Lagrange Points have similar corresponding points in Particle Physics, and since at the atomic level we get a rare and interesting tunneling effect, then it is safe to say, that we not only need more research here, but we have the opportunity to applications near and far based on this potential eventuality.
So please consider all this.
References: 1.
- Research in Book; "The Classical Atom: Stabilization of Electronic Trojan Wavepackets D Papenfu, D Lust, WP Schleich, D Farrelly, EA Lee, and T Uzer; Published Online: November 29, 2007; (BC: 10.
1002/9783527610853.
ch28).
Let me explain this theory of mine.
You see, not long ago a talk to a mathematician expert from the University of California at Riverside, who specialized in Lagrange points.
And I ask this question; With regards to superconductor magnetic fields, is there a potential for Micro-Lagrange Points? Since scientists have found that two small pieces of Graphene in a lab can be spun at 60,000 RPM, in essence they are creating a magnetic field and the micro-superconductor.
Now then, if a set of spinning graphene micro-cut outs are moving around, as a superconductor wood, and since they conduct electricity extremely well, I asked; is there a neutral point in all that flow of energy? If so, it's a safe space for something, which leads to additional applications.
Consider if you will, if we are talking about superconductors on a very large scale, it could be a place for a "pod" for cargo, travelers, etc.
- there must be applications, and this should exist right? And at a micro scale, that is to say a couple of Graphene sheets perhaps a micron or so across, spinning and 60,000 RPM will create something that would simulate planetary Lagrange points.
Indeed there was a study and some research on this [1] - which suggests that such points could trap wave packets in a similar way to Jupiter's lagrange points trapping Trojan Asteroids at the planetary level.
And in this research it further suggests a tunneling factor, and a stable and slow decaying condition of these points in Rydberg atoms.
So, then, if this condition happens at the atomic level, and the planetary level, then it should happen anytime spinning parts revolve next to each other, as they do in Superconductors.
I'd hereby like to dare anyone to prove my theory wrong.
Because since Planetary Lagrange Points have similar corresponding points in Particle Physics, and since at the atomic level we get a rare and interesting tunneling effect, then it is safe to say, that we not only need more research here, but we have the opportunity to applications near and far based on this potential eventuality.
So please consider all this.
References: 1.
- Research in Book; "The Classical Atom: Stabilization of Electronic Trojan Wavepackets D Papenfu, D Lust, WP Schleich, D Farrelly, EA Lee, and T Uzer; Published Online: November 29, 2007; (BC: 10.
1002/9783527610853.
ch28).